Corporate Social Responsibilty in the European Union


Last week, we had the opportunity to speak at the European Union's daylong conference, Communities in Social Responsibility, in Budapest. The following is a guest post by Robin Marshall summarizing the day and the topics discussed, including the five progressive levels of corporate citizenship (as related to employee volunteering).

Connecting communities

Call it Corporate Social Responsibility, call it Corporate Citizenship, either way, volunteerism is proving an ever-larger part of it. And so are the ideas of trust and faith, a belief that small things can lead to big changes. Most of all, it is about building communities.

Those were some of the core lessons to come out from a daylong conference called Communities in Social Responsibility held at the Kempinski Hotel Corvinus Budapest on May 19, 2011, organised by Hungarian Interchurch Aid in cooperation with E.ON and Vodafone.

Featuring guest speakers from Canada and Germany, along with workshops on Corporate Volunteering and HR and how to make best use of the opportunities in social media, presentations covered the perspective of mediators, NGOs and business, as well as best practice examples from E-ON and Vodafone.

But while the principal sponsors can be justly proud of what they have achieved, the idea of the day was not to create a stage from which they could grandstand. Rather, it was to spread knowledge and information about what is possible, and sharing that with as many people as possible.

Thus not only were the HR, PR, CSR leaders and Corporate Volunteering Coordinators of top Hungarian companies invited, but also partner businesses from Croatia, which has close links with Hungary and is on the way to EU membership.

Voadaphone & E-on

“Learn from our mistakes and take what worked,” said Gábor Intődy, Head of Internal Communications and CR at Vodafone Hungary. “There is no golden rule,” warned Dr. Eric Depluet, CEO, E-on Hungary, “but I can tell you what works for us.”

What Intődy, Depluet and the other speakers did was layout an effective framework within which volunteerism and CSR can not only function at a company level, but also flourish.

Key components include having a budget, having a solid understanding of what it is you want to do, seeking help from those who have knowledge you may lack (NGOs and moderators who can match the desire of your employees to help with those in need). An early, vital key to success is persuading senior management to buy-in. “At the end of the day, it all starts with the leadership,” said Depluet.

Intődy pointed out that the very concept of CSR, and the leading companies’ level of engagement with it, has radically changed. “Modern Corporate Social Responsibility is shifting from donations and cheque writing to an activity that is a lot more in-bedded into the corporate identity.” What that means in practise is “bringing our unique skills and experience to bear.” Vodafone concentrates its CSR into three main areas: building communities, education and security and safety.

Increasingly, social media sites such as facebook are becoming a means to connect with customers, but as a forum to engage in conversations about what is important to them, rather than simply as another channel through which to sell a message or product.

Skill sets are also brought to bear in the educational field, where Vodafone is part of the ROMAster programme run by the Hungarian Business Leaders’ Forum, offering scholarships and work placements to talented Roma students, with senior managers such as Intődy also mentoring them.

Involvement with the community can also lead to new markets. Vodafone has developed an emergency solution for an NGO that is given to women who are at risk of suffering domestic abuse. “It uses GPS tracking and mobile telephone technology to send a message to the police telling them the exact location of the woman if she feels threatened, without the need for her to make a phone call… How do you make money from CSR? We think we can probably sell that technology solution to foresters or bank security firms, for example.”

Like Vodafone, energy company E.ON takes a highly structured approach to its CSR programme, and has achieved much in a relatively short period of time. “We were late when we started in 2007,” Depluet said bluntly. “We were behind other companies, there was a danger we could be seen as a company that was outside the community rather than in it. CSR was a necessity.” Again, that word community. CSR is much more about connecting with the wider world, and your employees, about things that are important to them, than about good PR.

Both sponsoring companies make paid time available for their staff to engage in volunteerism on top of their usual holiday allowance. Both allow their employees to chose how (indeed if) they use that time. Compulsion doesn’t work; employees have to be free to do something that touches them. Both companies have found that employees feel better about their work because they are allowed to volunteer. Happy workers, endless studies have shown, are better workers, more productive, more willing to act as ambassadors for their employers. But it is a trust that has to be earned, from staff and customers alike. “I don’t believe you can buy good will,” Depluet warned.

Pattberg & Jarvis

Fabian Pattberg, a CSR and social media expert from Germany, joked, “My background is more as an Internet nerd, I guess.” But fellow speaker Chris Jarvis described Pattberg as, “Knowing everything there is to know about social media.” The German ran a workshop in the afternoon on PR and communication called Opportunities in social media: How to best communicate corporate volunteering (or other CSR) programmes.

At the same time, a Canadian Jarvis, co-founder and Senior Consultant for Realized Worth, a leading employee volunteering and CSR consulting firm, was shedding light on the practicalities of “how to make it happen from an employees’ perspective.”

But before he got down to the details, he presented another example of why CSR makes good business sense, a Harvard Business School report into North American retail giant Sears. The study found that if Sears could improve employee attitudes by five points that would in turn make a 1.3 improvement in customer satisfaction, which would lead to a 0.5% improvement in revenue. “It’s common sense really,” explained Jarvis. “If people like the shopping experience, they buy more stuff.” And when you are as big as Sears, even a 0.5% improvement amounts to $65 million dollars a year. “If we can get employees loving their jobs, we will be a bigger business,” Jarvis insisted.

Realized Worth

Jarvis and his partner and co-founder Angela Parker say their goal “is to elevate employee volunteering from a task-oriented activity to a transformative experience”. They have identified five progressive levels of corporate citizenship (as related to employee volunteering). First is private volunteering, undertaken by employees with no input from the company. Next up is supported employee volunteering, where the company is aware of the activity, and supportive of it, but plays no further role. Employer sponsored volunteering (staff are given time off to volunteer) is followed by employer planned volunteering (staff join a company project) and, finally, business integrated company volunteering, where CSR has become part of the DNA of a company.

Companies such as Walmart (which Jarvis says is now driving its CSR values through its supply chain) or IBM, have the ability to become game changers. The latter, for example, will pull together a Corporate Service Corps of individuals from across its business, send them out on a 30-day secondment to live in and help a remote community, and then bring them, the knowledge and experiences they have gained back to “make us smarter”, as Jarvis put it. The company has also developed some 200 modules that employees can access to help them in their volunteering, be it sitting on an NGO board or organising a nursery.

All business are different, which is why Jarvis and Parker will first sit down with a company (“one of the most important things we do in our work is listening”) to evaluate its goals and aims along with the aspirations of its staff, and how experienced they are in the field of volunteerism. Jarvis lauded the Vodafone’s “incredible examples”, but there is no point in trying to replicate its model if you don’t have the budget and your staff have never even painted a playground fence.

It is also important to find effective partners who can “bridge the gap” between volunteers and NGOs, who themselves are usually the link to people in need. If corporate volunteerism isn’t properly planned, it won’t serve the employee (“what employees want is a sense of meaning and purpose in live, it’s part of the human condition,” Jarvis explained), the employer, the NGO or the intended recipients.

Whatever the company, there are four conditions that must be met to have a successful programme, Jarvis said “Why conditions? Conditioning is what you need to do to make it work in the real world.” These are space, structure, movement and motivation. 

Speaking afterwards, Jarvis said it was hard to predict what level of volunteerism take up a company might have. “I can give you the average figure, and that’s 20%, but that probably more reflects how bad the measuring is. How you record such data is one of the biggest talking points right now.” Suffice it to say, however, that if you have set up a corporate volunteerism scheme and a couple of years in find your employee take up figures are below 20%, you probably need to go back and look at those four areas again.

Sadly, there isn’t room here to go into more detail, but Realized Worth’s web- and blog-site (http://realizedworth.blogspot.com) contains a lot more information. Other speakers at the conference were László Lehel, President-director of Hungarian Interchurch Aid (HIA), Dr. Anikó Lévai, Goodwill Ambassador of HIA, Dr. Radácsi László, Lead of Volunteering and Partnering Working Group at Hungarian Business Leaders Forum, András F.Tóth, Executive director, National Volunteer Centre of Hungary), Kristóf Gáncs, Head of Unit, Corporate Relations, HIA, and Borbála Papp-Váry, Deputy State Secretary, State Secretariat for Government Communication, Ministry of Public Administration and Justice.

 Robin Marshall is a fully qualified journalist with more than 22 years experience, the last 10 as managing editor of an English-language newspaper based in Budapest, Hungary. He has a proven track record at running editorial departments to tight budgets while maintaining quality. Marshall is equally at home working alone or managing a multi-national team.


At Realized Worth, we can help you design and implement an employee volunteering program. Give us a call to discuss your company's needs. 317.371.4435


Share/Bookmark

Employee Volunteering: Are Companies Realizing the Potential?

When it comes to corporate social responsibility and creating 'shared value', companies are still not taking advantage of their greatest asset: their employees.

The potential for companies to impact society for good seems to be increasing at an exponential pace. There are a number reasons why this is happening:

Reason 1: The growing popularity of Corporate Social Responsibility


A growing number of companies are seeing and discussing the numerous business benefits of CSR. Despite the confusion sometimes espoused by academics and the media, CSR is being embraced as a profitable and competitive strategy.

Reason 2: Customers are beginning to demand more from the companies that supply their goods and services.

In the words of Carol Cone, Edelman’s recent research revealed that “It is no longer enough to slap a ribbon on a product. Americans seek deeper involvement in social issues and expect brands and companies to provide various means of engagement...we call this the rise of the ‘citizen consumer.’ (Read more here.)

Reason 3: Sustainability is THE issue we are all facing, whether as governments, businesses, societies or individuals.

As Julie Urlaub wrote on her blog a few months back:

“While many organizations falsely subscribe to the belief that business sustainability is only for larger organizations, there is the recognition that risk doesn't discriminate. To unprepared organizations, the business risks of carbon, water, and climate change disclosure takes many forms:
  • Potential increase in operating cost
  • Potential increase in supply costs
  • Potential disruptions to supply or loss of supplier relationships
  • Potential loss of revenue or market share
  • Potential to business reputation
  • Potential inability to secure investment dollars or capital
Julie also notes, “According to Ernst & Young’s 2010 Business Risk Report, corporate social responsibility and the need for social acceptance both appeared on the top ten risks facing businesses.”

Beyond these (and many others not listed here) compelling reasons for doing business in a way that generates value for the company and the communities in which they operate, there is still the issue of how this is accomplished.

What Are We Missing?

While companies are beginning to focus on greening their supply chains, reducing the carbon footprint of their operations, ethically sourcing resources, as well as paying more attention to healthy and diverse workplaces, comparatively little is being done to leverage their greatest assets for social benefits: the employees.

Employees represent the strongest and broadest link between most corporations and their stakeholders. Understanding the value and impact of social capital may be a necessary precursor to embracing this fact, yet it seems fairly obvious that a company with over 20,000 employees has an immediate and relational connection with almost 2 million people around the world. This is especially pertinent considering 78% of consumers trust peer recommendations, while only 14% of a company’s customers (and stakeholders) trust advertisements. (More about trust and CSR here.)

In fact, according to the 2010 publication of Deloitte’s Volunteer IMPACT Survey in the USA “Corporate America is giving workplace volunteerism a strong vote of confidence as a means to make a significant, long-term difference in their communities.” Apparently “more than eight in 10 companies (84 percent) believe that volunteerism can help nonprofits accomplish long-term social goals, and are increasingly offering skills-based volunteer opportunities to employees.”

The Good News....may not be so good after all


Even though 60% of the businesses that responded to Deloitte’s survey reported that they offer skilled volunteering as an option for their employees, the actual number of employees who volunteer at this level is negligible. Based on our research and conversations with companies, it is very normal to find large global corporations with 60,000 plus employees running ‘skilled-based’ volunteering programs or ‘pro-bono’ programs with fewer than 1% of their employees volunteering at this level.

Many companies, including Deloitte, are much happier to report their episodic and general volunteering numbers. In 2010, a large number of Deloitte employees, 33,600 or 75% of their U.S. workforce, rolled up their sleeves on June 11th for a few hours of volunteering. Some of that volunteering obviously required some skill - most did not.

A few hours out of the office once a year to volunteer is good, it’s just not good enough.

It is impossible to effect attitudinal and behavioural changes in the workplace through this type of corporate volunteering. What’s more, the value to society is also negligible. In fact, many nonprofits would suggest that the cost to their organizations far outweighs any potential (let alone realized) benefits.

So while there is growing consensus among business leaders on the potential they have to impact society for good, little is being done to leverage their most accessible and powerful asset. It’s not that they don’t believe in the power of employee volunteering programs, “More than nine in 10 (91 percent) respondents agree their employees' business skills would be valuable to a nonprofit.

So why the disconnect?

I want to suggest three reasons why employee volunteering struggles to evolve past the one day (week) events and limited numbers in skilled-volunteering programs.
  1. We treat our employees who volunteer as one-dimensional. That’s wrong. A good volunteering program must be three dimensional.
  2. We measure the wrong things. Well, that’s not entirely true. We just aren’t measuring the most important things. Companies tend to focus on promoting the ‘outputs’ of their programs. They should be focusing on the outcomes and long term impacts of their employee volunteer programs. Why? Until companies like Deloitte start to measure the actual impact of 33,600 their employees out working in the community for a day, they won’t understand the real value of their activity.
  3. Finally, and maybe most importantly, most companies do not collaborate with their influential employees to create impactful programs. Worse, many companies (with a fixation on those ‘output’ numbers) end up ‘stealing’ the social capital of their employees. Or at least that’s how the employees perceive it. A common response by employees in this scenario is ‘hey, I volunteer on my own time -it’s my own thing and has nothing to do with my employer’.  Companies have to collaborate with the ‘influentials’ to capture the massive social capital they represent and then work to convert the employees who don’t volunteer (2 out of 3) and probably don’t see the value of volunteering.
If you’d like to learn more about how to do this, we'd love to talk to you. You can reach us here:
chris@realizedworth.com
angela@realizedworth.com
317.371.4435
Share/Bookmark

The Best Thing About Employee Volunteering. Period.

Volunteers of America of Minnesota
In October of 2010 we had the privilege to join the Entrepreneurs Foundation in the Bay Area (California) for a salon-style discussion on employee volunteering.

I talked about how to meet our employee volunteers at their highest level of contribution. In order to do that, we have to understand two things (at least). First, we all engage the volunteering experience at different levels. That's because there are three stages in the journey of a volunteer: tourist, traveler, and guide. (Here's how to design a program in light of this reality)

Second, we need to understand the best thing about employee volunteering. It's not recruitment, retainment, employee satisfaction or even the positive impact in our communities. It's far more profound and life changing.

This is an abridged 15 minute video that you can watch here.


Here's a bit more about the Entrepreneurs Foundation (EF):

Entrepreneurs Foundation (EF) was founded in 1998 to make it easy for companies to meaningfully engage in their communities through strategic corporate citizenship and corporate social responsibility programs. Through Entrepreneurs Foundation, over 880+ companies in the United States and Israel have created corporate foundations and community benefit programs.

In partnership with Entrepreneurs Foundation, companies leverage their corporate assets to create customized philanthropy and community programs that meet corporate objectives and serve social needs. Entrepreneurs Foundation provides expertise, resources, best practices and a network to companies so that maximum corporate and community benefit is achieved. Additionally, Entrepreneurs Foundation provides a unique model for pre-public companies to invest in their communities by seed funding corporate foundations with pre-IPO stock.
Share/Bookmark

Free Cars for Nonprofits: How Toyota is Leading the Way

The voting for "100 Cars for Good" starts today. As a program that exemplifies successful collaboration, meaningful contributions, and effective brand alignment - its worth voting for.

Like the communities they serve, many non-profits struggle with a variety of issues that make day-to-day operations difficult. They lack resources, they lack time - and they often feel unseen by society.

One resource that is scarce for both low-income communities and non-profits is local transportation. For the fortunate ones who live in enlightened cities like Portland, Oregon, public transportation is free in city centers and ample even to the outside edges. In other cities, like Indianapolis, Indiana, transportation is all but non-existent. Poor people in urban Indy are likely to be stuck walking.

In my experience with small non-profits, transportation is always a major issue not only for those being served, but also for staff. Materials need to be moved, groceries delivered, appointments made, people moved from one shelter to another. Reliable transportation is essential.

Needless to say, when car manufacturers step up with offers to provide free cars for non-profits - everyone sits up to take notice.

FORD: The People's Fleet

Ford has launched The People’s Fleet™ for non-profits in LA.  The company has offered four non-profit organizations a 2012 Ford Focus to use for 3 months. But that’s not all. They are also providing a team of filmmakers and a ‘platform for financial empowerment’ for the same time period.

The idea is, while Ford is meeting the non-profit’s transportation needs, they will also capture and share the organization’s stories. Ultimately, this will raise awareness for the non-profit, their cause - and for Ford.

If you’d like to learn more, you can check out their page and watch a video. (It’s a bit difficult to find many details on the program from the site, but still - it’s a cool video.)

TOYOTA: 100 Cars For Good

Toyota USA is launching (today!) their "100 Cars For Good” program. This is a national (not regional) program in which Toyota will donate 100 cars over 100 days to 100 deserving nonprofit organizations. The non-profits will keep the cars.

In addition, Toyota is asking the general public to help them determine who should receive the cars. For this purpose, they’ve set up a Toyota USA Facebook page where you can go and vote for your favorite non-profit.

Each day, beginning May 9th, for 100 days, 5 different nonprofit organizations will need your votes to win the cars. But don’t worry, everybody wins in this contest: the four runner-up organizations (each day) will be given consolation prizes of $1000.

If you’re interested, you can go to the Toyota USA Facebook page and cast your vote today. You’ll find an online profile which may include a video showcasing how the organization plans to use a new Toyota vehicle to do good in their local community.



Making Contributions Meaningful

Toyota is investing in this community program in a significant way. The non-profits get ample choice and support with their free car: “Winning organizations can choose from the following vehicles: Toyota Prius, Tacoma, Tundra, Highlander Hybrid, Sienna, or Sienna Mobility. With each vehicle, Toyota Financial Services will provide a six-year 100,000 mile Toyota Vehicle Service Agreement to help provide extended protection from mechanical breakdowns beyond the vehicle warranty.” (Read the full press release here).

The Toyota program is a great example of making a meaningful contribution to the community while strengthening the corporate brand at the same time. Here’s why:
  • Collaboration - Yes, online voting programs are more commonplace these days and may lack some of the allure of originality, but they still involve people. This is essential for today’s consumer.
  • Meaningful Contributions - To be honest, there’s not much comparison between Ford’s program and Toyota’s: 1. A free car (forever) versus a borrowed vehicle; 2. The ability to select the model you want versus being given the car the manufacturer wants to promote; 3. 500 nonprofits compared to four. Plus, Toyota will support the vehicles with a generous warranty. This isn’t a PR stunt; it’s a real contribution
  • Brand Alignment - Toyota employees may plant trees every so often, but this program is directly aligned with the company’s strongest assets: great cars. When companies contribute to society our of their business capacities and products, that’s high impact community investment.
We haven’t seen similar programs from other car manufactures, but if you know of one please feel free to list it with a link in the comments section.


Want to discuss your company's employee volunteering program? Contact us here:
chrisjarvis@realizedworth.com
angela@realizedworth.com
317.371.4435
Share/Bookmark

A Best Practice: Corporate Citizenship & Storytelling

I think I may have found my favorite example of how to tell the Corporate Citizenship story....

This past March, we had the opportunity to join The Entrepreneur Foundation of Central Texas for their annual conference held in Austin, Texas. (Fun city by the way - Angela and I loved it!) The conference represented many of the ‘best in class’ companies in corporate citizenship. We were there to present: “Employee Volunteers and Social Media: Best Practices in Storytelling for Companies.”

Just before my presentation, I wandered into a workshop on cause marketing and social media. Flow Nonfiction, a creative agency and turnkey production company (specializing in branded documentaries for socially conscious companies), was presenting some of their work.

I was mildly curious. I love learning, but with my mind fixed on my presentation which was set to start in an hour, I admit, I was only partially listening.

Needless to say, I wasn’t prepared for what came next.

My Favorite Example

David Modigliani, the Creative Director at Flow Nonfiction, said a few words and then turned on this video:



He had me.

I watched - and quite unexpectedly, I cared about what I was watching.

Here’s why:
  • The video is professionally produced, but I didn’t really notice it. The story is the most important element, not the production quality of the video.
  • I doesn't feel like a commercial for Downy or Downy Touch of Comfort. Besides a brief moment during the intro and closing, apparently Downy didn’t feel the need to smother me with brand placement. Perfect.
  • The plot is simple. Only what is shareable has value when it comes to stories and this is a story I can share.
  • The story is completely credible. It appealed to truths and values we all share.
  • The video connects with me emotionally as well as intellectually - but neither overwhelms the other.
  • There is a clear and simple call to action at the end of the video inviting me to partner with the brand to make good things happen.
  • And finally, Lauren (the little 3 year old) is adorable. (Not sure that one can be duplicated. It’s more like magic.) The point is, by allowing the children and volunteers to take center stage, Downy benefited.
Some Ideas on How to Use Video at Your Company
  • Here are some more ways Downy has been exemplary in using this wonderful story.
  • The film was screened for all Downy employees resulting in an increase in the number of volunteers for Quilts for Kids from 500 to over 12,700, many of whom were Downy employees.
  • The film is now shown as a part of training for new Downy employees.
  • The film is also used as part of a Downy’s recruitment strategy, offering potential employees a feel for the company’s culture and priorities.
  • Downy’s parent company, P&G, used the film in their Town Hall meeting.
More about Flow Nonfiction

Flow Nonfiction tells CSR stories by showing the impact of a company's commitment through film. They have created films for Tide, Downy, Microsoft/Bing and the Clinton Global Initiative, among others. (Some of their videos are posted on Flow Nonfiction's facebook page.)

If you’re curious, here’s how the process works for producing a video like this:
  1. Flow developed a treatment for the film and then refined it with the brand and the company’s PR Agency.
  2. Flow shot the film, edited it, and scored it (by the way, Flow produces original music for everything they make - cool eh?)
  3. Flow worked through 3 rounds of feedback with the Downy in order to capture all their feedback into the final production.
  4. Flow produced another 10 featurettes that were produced from the 22 hours of additional footage were used to populate Downy’s website.
Another fantastic video to check out (and one that Flow Nonfiction is particularly proud of) is one they produced about Tide's "Loads of Hope" work in post-earthquake Haiti. In fact, this film was screened at the Sundance Film Festival. The trailer is here and if you're intrigued.

We can get you in touch with David Modigliani from Flow NonFiction, just contact us at the info below. Hoping to learn more about Realized Worth? We'd love to talk - just call, email or comment.
chrisjarvis@realizedworth.com
angela@realizedworth.com
317.371.4435
Share/Bookmark

Canada does not support volunteering - not officially, anyway.

Voting in Canada today? Consider this: Canadians are proud of their social values and strong commitments to ideas such as public health care, but it’s time for us to take a page out of the Americans playbook and get serious about civic engagement through volunteering.

Last year, Justin Trudeau (son of one of the more famous Canadian Prime Ministers) proposed a bill that would see the creation of a national voluntary service policy.

It was soundly defeated by the ruling Conservative party of Prime Minister Harper.

We hate to say it, but we kinda knew that would happen.

Today, Canadians are heading to the polls to vote in the latest Federal election. The two major parties (Liberals and Conservatives) have markedly different perspectives on the importance of civic engagement. The Liberals want to bolster volunteerism in Canada by finally offering official support beyond grants and research. They are proposing the creation of a new Canada Service Corps, similar to the American ‘Corporation for National Community Service’ which has done much to energize and support civic engagement in the US.

Specifically, the Canada Service Corps will:
  • Increase Canadians awareness of the value and rewards of volunteerism and civic engagement
  • Increase capacity, knowledge-sharing and training of Canada’s volunteer organizations; and
  • Create additional opportunities for Canadians to volunteer in a meaningful way.
The Liberals have outlined a robust and aggressive plan that will see an initial investment of $180 million over four years in the new Canada Service Corps. The plans seem relatively specific and well thought out:

“From these funds, $20 million will be dedicated to capacity-building and promotion in the voluntary sector. Specifically, the Canada Service Corps will work to develop networks of voluntary non-profit organizations and fund training and capacity building programs to encourage, sustain and support volunteerism. The Corps will also support volunteer non-profit organizations in marketing themselves to attract volunteers.

The remaining $160 million over four years will be invested to encourage volunteerism in young Canadians. The Canada Service Corps will forgive $1500 in student loan debt for young Canadians who donate at least 150 hours of service in a year, in a Canada Service Corps volunteer position after graduating from post-secondary education. The volunteer service can also take place in a gap year or during studies, but the debt relief will be contingent on completing studies. This initiative will create up to 26,000 volunteer postings annually. The Canada Service Corps will work with voluntary and non-profit sectors to create domestic and international volunteer positions.”
(Read more here.)

In contrast to this, the Conservatives have a rather anemic and laughably small-minded approach. In February of this year, Prime Minister Harper established the annual The Prime Minister’s Volunteer Awards. The winners “of the regional awards will receive a $5,000 grant for the not-for-profit organization of their choice and national award recipients will receive $10,000.”

Without other meaningful supports at a legislative level within Canada, these awards smack of nothing more than political emptiness.

The specific ambitions of the Conservative party are simply to:
  • establish Social Impact Bonds to raise money for promising new community initiatives
  • simplify funding agreements and reduce red tape for applicants
  • test new ways to engage the private sector and maximize the effectiveness of government support
  • provide funding to Volunteer Canada to develop a volunteer matching service (Read more here.)
That’s it. Nothing else.

Promising to do government better by reducing red tape and giving Volunteer Canada some dollars to come up with the Canadian version of VolunteerMatch is fairly meaningless. (Not that such a service wouldn’t be helpful, but it’s a far cry from officially supporting volunteerism.)

Canadians are proud of their social values and strong commitments to ideas such as public health care. But it’s time for us to take a page out of the Americans playbook and get serious about civic engagement through volunteering.

I’m not saying it’s a simple adoption of the US version - my partner and I noted some of our reservations with this model in a recent edition of the Stanford Social Innovation Review - but we have been too easily placated by a few dollars here and there. We have become satisfied with shiny trophies such as the Conservatives are offering (yet again) while dismantling any real federal support for Canadian citizens who volunteer.

Our nonprofit sector, and those Canadians who serve and are served, deserve better.

We’ll find out today whether we’ll get what we deserve.

Need help designing and implementing a new or better employee volunteer program?
Contact us here:
chrisjarvis@realizedworth.com or angela@realizedworth.com
317.371.4435

Share/Bookmark

Search This Blog

Loading...