(Just scroll down to skip to the solution.)
I am a social media enthusiast. Once a reluctant skeptic, I have since become a convert - even evangelist - for the practical and innovative uses of all things social media. From twitter to facebook, linkedin to the blogsphere, there is simply no other avenue for communication with comparable reach or effectiveness. New media is the new relevance - like it or not.
So what’s the problem?
Well, here’s the thing: When I am at the airport, waiting to get through the long security line, watching the guy in front of me struggle with his shoe laces and fumble for his keys, there is only one thing that sustains me: I will buy myself a shiny new magazine on the other side.
And when I’m out by the pool on a hot summer day, I just don’t enjoy reading my news through the glare on the screen of my iphone. I want a newspaper.
I love print. I love the feel of the pages in my hands and the scent of freshly printed ink. I willingly give in to the lure of typography and color and, when the last page of the last article is through, I feel the distinct satisfaction of completion.
Lately however, I have experienced a clash of values:
Social Media and print are at odds - and as we know, social media is on its way up while print is on its way out. Unless, of course, social media can save print.
And it can. Here’s how:
There is a new iphone and android app called Sticky Bits. It allows you to scan any barcode and attach a message to that physical object. You can download and print your own barcodes, or scan an existing one on a physical product like a can of Coke. Each barcode is programmable by the first person who scans it and and leaves a photo, video, audio, or text message. The next time somebody scans that barcode, the previous message will appear on their phone. Anyone can add a new message to the same code, resulting in a stream of messages connected to whatever object or place the barcode is stuck on. With this app, every object around you becomes “live.”
You see where I’m going here?
With the simple addition of a programmed barcode to the end of every magazine article or advertisement, print becomes interactive. With a quick scan, readers have access to all the value and benefits that social media has to offer (review these benefits in the chart above). No more letters to the editor (comments are immediate - authors can even opt to interact directly with barcode users), no more “archived” print pieces (they will be relevant for as long as editors and barcode users choose to keep it that way), and no more looming death of the printing press. With interactive print, social media marries the magazine and everyone lives happily ever after.
Alright people, let’s make this happen! Either comment below or send me an email here:
Email Chris at chrisjarvis@realizedworth.com
Email Angela at angela@realizedworth.com
C: 1-317-372-4435
Join our Facebook Page
Follow Chris on Twitter @RealizedWorth
Follow Angela on Twitter @AngelaJeane
Check out Chris' LinkedIn Profile




8 comments:
What intrigues me about StickyBits (which I just downloaded and have been playing around with), is how it has the potential to make everything social - to put every physical object into the social media space. It creates room for engagement, discourse, reviews. That is ... if it catches on!
Imagine walking into a store and trying to decide between two products. You scan each and read the reviews for both! So cool.
Or imagine visiting a museum exhibit and it has a bar code you can scan. Perhaps the museum would tag it with interesting facts, or you could browse other peoples' impressions!
I think this application has a lot of potential, but will it catch on?
Thanks for the comment, Zack. I'm curious to hear what you think about "sticky bits" as you continue using them. Love the thought: "It has the potential to put every physical object into the social media space." Brilliant! I agree that the question is really about whether or not this will catch on...I hope so because I really would love to see something similar in magazines and newspapers.
So I've been thinking that taking photos of barcodes might be bordering on the low tech. Trying to snap a photo of the barcode is clunky and takes some time. I think the StickyBits program would have a little more traction if the point of contact had a little more ... finesse. Here's an article about Near Field Communication (NFC) - which is similar to what Visa, MasterCard and may gas stations use for they "quick-pay" systems. http://bit.ly/8Xv9S3 - I think this could be the future of StickyBits-like apps.
Chris, the concept is brilliant. I too enjoy the feel of paper in hand (ink on fingers not so much) and was reluctant to join the facebook and twitter crowds but am glad I did. I have yet to make the leap to the smart phone, though. Seems the least it would cost is another $30/mo, which is about what I pay to feed an AIDS orphan in South Africa. So far I'm getting by with a stupid phone and a netbook. Will the StickyBits app benefit someone like me?
PS I realize it's only a matter of time before I get a smart phone...just trying to hold off as long as possible. prolly a pride thing.
Hm, this post is chock full of interesting stuff... few thoughts:
Data Ubiquity:
The future in which we point our mobile devices at physical objects in order to read their histories (place of origin, manufacturing techniques, comments by friends, etc) - and to interact with them is coming... for sure. StickyBits is enabling software - as are some of the image recognition apps that use a photo as the "key," rather than a barcode. Shazzam does the same thing using audio as the key. All bring the real world alive with data. So called "augmented reality."
Print and Data Ubiquity?
Does data ubiquity save print? I think you're referring to print primarily as a way to convey a narrative. Does print get more interesting when it's augmented by social data? Sure. But do we need print to tell a great story? Not for long. Assuming that something like the iPad will eventually roll up or fold up and fit into your pocket (http://gizmodo.com/161890/polymer-vision-screen-thin-as-paper-in-cellphones-someday) or our contact lenses will project data right into our brains (http://www.immersiveux.com/2009/09/augmented-reality-in-a-contact-lens.html), will magazines be the way in which we tell stories? I'm doubtful. I think instead, we'll see the death of print based narrative... relegating it to an advertisement for a story that's told digitally... like the Toyota ad that you post above.
Should we save print?
Is "print" worthy of being saved? I take your point that there's a great pleasure to be had from paging through a story. I've got a Kindle and an iPad, but I'd prefer to read a book any day. It just feels better. But is it worth the shipping miles and the paper? I have doubts. I also love the quality of light and form of the filament from an incandescent light bulb. But is it worth the 95% wasted energy for me to indulge in the glow of incandescent light? Or should we look at it like fine chocolate... something to be enjoyed once in a while as a treat - or as art - versus an everyday habit...?
Journalism. Sure. I'd save it everyday. But print as a conveyance of narrative? Not as sure.
Great post.
Thanks.
-ben
CTO, The Extraordinaries
www.beextra.org
Richard, love the reluctant attitude - you sound just like me! Obviously, I've gotten on board with smartphones and all things technology now, and...I have to admit, while there are always drawbacks (like the tendency to be tied too tightly to technology), I feel like I'm able to be a better, more aware and connected person overall. The stickybits app may not be as quickly accessible to non-smartphone users, but the fact that it would help more people ask better questions would be beneficial to society as a whole. And I think you might just feel motivated to jump on the smartphone bandwagon even sooner! ;) (With ready access to social media you can help educate people about their potential role to support AIDS orphans. Pretty exciting stuff!) Thanks so much for the comment.
Zack - brilliant thought, great article! I agree - the "photos" seem a little....old-school. Looking forward to chatting with you more!
Ben - Wow! I appreciate you taking the time to share such a well-thought out response. I think maybe I should have asked you to write this blog post! Seriously, your thoughts round out the initial idea with the "bigger picture" perspective that I didn't address. You're right to clarify that it's narrative I want to save and we don't necessarily need to save print in order to save stories. I do, however, think that print is going to be around for quite awhile...and offering a way to merge it with social media may be a low-drama way to gradually phase out print. Not sure if that will be applicable when we actually get to the "phase out" stage, though. I'd love to hear more thoughts from you, Ben - thanks so much for sharing!
Being Environmentally conscious such as myself and other green-brands, we use twitter to broadcast digital ads to our followers; but that does not mean we forget offline publishing. Twitter and other social media platforms lessens our expenses via print which itself is limited in scope if compared to the world wide avenue that is the web.
Post a Comment