Corporate Social Responsibility - Competitive Advantage? Maybe.

Corporate Social Responsibility will never offer companies a competitive advantage - unless it is both competitive and advantageous. If you are a risk taker, and step out from the herd, CSR may offer you the edge. If you can tie it to key business strategies, it will also make you more successful. Mediocre action coupled with reporting ‘company niceties’ won’t do it.

How to be Remarkable

I like Mallen Baker’s stuff. He’s a writer, speaker, and strategic advisor on corporate social responsibility and the Founding Director of Business Respect. He also writes pretty regularly for the Ethical Corporation (also liking it). Just today, I came across a bold article regarding CSR strategies. Baker’s point is simply the following: If you want to advertise CSR as giving your company a competitive advantage, well then it has to stand out. It has to be remarkable.

Here’s what Baker feels might make for remarkable CSR:

  1. Publicly breaking ranks with your industry sector over an issue where you know things have to change, but everyone has been holding on hoping it wouldn't change just yet.
  2. Taking time to understand what it would look like to have achieved sustainability in your company, and then announcing this vision as your target.
  3. Accompanying point 2 above with a clear action plan of how you're going to get there
  4. Selling the imperative for this to your shareholders, and standing up to those who think it's fine so long as it doesn't affect next quarter's figures
  5. Understanding your customers as citizens, not just as consumers, and reflecting that in the products you make, the marketing you do.
  6. Lobby governments when you see market signals promoting socially undesirable outcomes - even when they benefit you in the short term.
  7. Admit your mistakes in your CSR report, and what you've learned from them. I mean including your biggest ones, not just a token one because you know people give credit to reports that admit to something negative.
This article first appeared in the 21 March 2009 @ 03:10 pm EST issue of The International Business Times. You can read the full article here.

How to Report “Remarkable”

Ouch. The above list may be a bit of a wake up call for many corporations who are doing their best just trying to capture the metrics to go in a report, let alone beat their competitors.

I agree with Baker, and wrote up an article addressing the flip-side of the coin: CSR reports.

CSR reports. Why, oh why, is naivete the norm? The information is available, the compilers are smart (smarter than me, I’m sure), the readers are vested shareholders (and smart too, no doubt). There is simply no justification for reports on Corporate Social Responsibility to be so disastrously void of compelling data.

You can read it here - Corporate Social Responsibility Reports Fail To Prove The Business Case.

Mallen Baker’s site can be found at www.mallenbaker.net. His www.BusinessRespect.net site is also a source of great information. Oh, and you can follow him on Twitter @mallenbaker.


chrisjarvis@realizedworth.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/chrisjarviscan
twitter - @RealizedWorth
Share/Bookmark

Six Reasons Why You'll Never Volunteer Again

The downturn in the economy is proving to be a boon to volunteerism. It won’t matter. Most non profits are egregiously under-resourced in staff, dollars and expertise. Here are six reasons why most volunteer experiences will inoculate people against ever coming back.

The Push-and-Pull Effect

I am more than enthused about President Obama’s national call to service. Almost 1.3 million hours have been pledged on the Starbucks Pledge3 site alone. According to Tara Weiss, in an article posted today on Forbes.com; “The Ronald McDonald House of New York has had a 10% increase in volunteers since this time last year.” In Boston, the United Way, Big Sisters and Boston Cares all report significant increases in volunteer numbers. Rick Wallwork, the Associate Director of Boston Cares, reflects that although February is usually pretty quiet, “the numbers are through the roof. We have more than 1900 volunteers signed up for month of February compared with 1150 volunteers throughout the month last year. That represents a 65 percent increase over last year.” (read the full article on wbur.org)

Unlike it has during past recessions, volunteerism is surging. The Corporation for National and Community Service (the federal agency that tracks volunteer numbers) estimates that one million people participated in January's Martin Luther King Day of Service, which is double the numbers for 2008.

AmeriCorps, a federal agency promoting volunteerism, has received three times the applications this year compared to 2008. Even applications to the Peace Corps spiked by 37%, most notably during the days before and after President Obama’s inauguration. (read the full article by The Canadian Press)

Certainly, the Obama Effect is pulling people into the arena of community service....but there is also a pretty strong push which we’re all too familiar with: unemployment.

Taproot is a US non-profit that matches skilled professionals with non-profits that need their expertise. In the last few months they have seen a whopping 171% increase in applications. Aaron Hurst, Taproot’s president believes this increase to be due in part to Obama’s national call to service, but due to information captured on the intake forms, he also knows that it is largely due to layoffs. (read the full Rueters article)

Gary Bagley, the director of New York Cares recently remarked, "We can't open the doors wide enough. Everything we're doing is full. Our orientations are booked three weeks in advance." He was curious as to why there was such a drastic increase in the number of volunteers he was seeing, so he began surveying the applicants. About 60% had experienced a change in their work situation, or were now unemployed. (read the full article by The Canadian Press)


Six reasons why you’ll probably never volunteer again

After listing numerous reasons why people might want to volunteer and outlining the benefits that lay in store for those who make the choice, Tara Weiss offers six steps to successful volunteering. (It’s set up like a slide show, but first you’ll have to turn off the annoying video advertising on the Forbes.com landing page.) Based on my experience, what Weiss has ironically (and maybe accidentally?) uncovered are six systemic flaws among most non-profits, including the reasons why most people will have an dissatisfying, if not downright unpleasant, experience.

So, here are Weiss’ six steps, and my six, “Yeah, but...” responses.


Step One: Set your goals
“Consider what you want to get out of a volunteer experience. Most people volunteer because they want to make a difference. But there are other things you may want too, such as: getting out from behind your computer and among people; networking; sharpening your professional skills; and learning new skills. Decide which are the most important and choose your volunteer position accordingly.”

Problem One: Non-profits are focused on agency goals - not yours.
Yes, most people volunteer because they want to make a difference, but...most non-profits are structured to utilize volunteers so that they (the org) can make a difference. These two objectives are often at odds and can consequently create hard feelings. On the other hand, you may be able to find a task that not only suits you, but achieves some goals you have around learning new skills. More likely, you’ll have to take whatever job you’re given.

Rebeca Holloway tried volunteering at a hospital after being laid off. At first, it was quite promising, but soon she, “absolutely hated it” and, “dreaded going into the office every week.” Why? “It takes energy to delegate and sometimes it’s easier for people to do it themselves,” said Holloway. “They had big plans for me, but it didn’t work out.” In the end, Rebeca found herself doing, “excruciatingly boring grunt work two days a week.” (read the full NY Times article)


Step Two: Make a time commitment
“How much time can you devote to volunteering? Answer honestly, since you don’t want to overcommit and then disappoint the organization. Consider how often you go on job interviews and how your schedule will change once you get a paid job.”

Problem Two: Non-profits don’t have the resources to commit to you.
Having a clear understanding of your ability to commit to a community organization is essential to a good experience. The problem these days, is that the non-profits cannot afford the same courtesy to those who sign up to volunteer with them. Why? Besides being notoriously underfunded when it comes to infrastructure, non-profits are reeling from the surge of good will. The result, according to Bertina Ceccarelli, a senior vice president at the United Way in New York, is that volunteers have entire weeks of time to fill. The problem she says, “It’s almost more work to find something for a volunteer to do than to just turn them away.” (read the full NY Times article)


Step Three: Face-to-face or virtual? “Some volunteer positions don't require any face-to-face contact, particularly ones that involve professional services. If you sit at your computer for hours searching for jobs, face-to-face contact may be a welcome reprieve. But some people prefer working alone at least some of the time.”

Problem Three: Due to Risk Management, you may not be allowed interaction with clients, anyway.
Overall, there is a fundamental lack of understanding regarding the reasons why people volunteer. Volunteering is about relationship and real-time, meaningful encounters. Remove the people and the real-life issue, and volunteering becomes pretty damn optional. Good volunteer opportunities connect with internal motivations in volunteers. Telling people it’s a “good” thing, while leaving the motivators at an external level, will inevitably result in volunteers opting out when something more important comes along.


Step Four: Understand the cause
“Once you're attracted to an organization, make sure you really know its mission and goals. If it's not a cause that strongly appeals to you, you probably won't enjoy the experience. Find something you feel passionate about.”

Problem Four: Due to being chronically overworked, few non-profits have the time to enliven a volunteer’s passion.
I absolutely agree with Weiss’ ‘step four.’ In order for volunteers to choose a cause they’re passionate about, the work of an organization needs to be clearly communicated to them. Incidentally, this does not mean handing out a Publisher pamphlet outlining the mission/vision/values. To truly understand an organization’s worth, people need to hear stories. Reading stories is fine, but somewhere along the line we all need to internalize the life of the non-profit. The work, the people, and the issues need to become part of the volunteer’s own narrative - and this requires dialogue. So what’s the problem? Most non-profits simply do not understand how essential verbal story telling is to volunteers. What’s worse, often there is little or no space provided for these stories to be told intentionally.


Step Five: Make sure there's structure
“Find out if the organization you'd like to volunteer for has the structure to support volunteer efforts. Your time will be best served if they've had volunteers before and know how to place them in the right roles. If it looks like there won't be anyone to supervise you, you likely won't have a rewarding experience.”

Problem Five: No one donates money to build the appropriate structure for managing volunteers.
Again, I agree with Weiss. Most volunteer positions offer a less than rewarding experience. This is exactly the reason: a severe lack of essential structures focused on the volunteers themselves. When an already precarious structure receives an influx of new volunteers, you have a recipe for disaster. The NY Times reports that “Smaller organizations, with staffs of fewer than 20 and no full-time volunteer coordinator, have struggled to absorb the influx, especially since many of them have simultaneously had to cut back on projects in the face of dwindling donations and government grants.” Too many volunteers, insufficient funding spent on managing volunteers (especially these days), and you’ll find nonprofit executives begging to stop the phones from ringing with offers to help.

Lindsay Firestone, who manages pro bono projects for Taproot, said the organization had scaled back recruitment this year after attracting more volunteers than it could possibly accommodate. “It’s like a Greek tragedy,” she said. “We’re thrilled to have all of these volunteers. But now organizations are stuck not being able to take advantage of it because they don’t have adequate funding.” (read the full article here).

Taproot may actually be the exception to the rule in this case. At Taproot, volunteers are a primary goal of the organization, but most non-profits are forced to see volunteers as a means to an end. Sure, good volunteers are always welcome, but non-profits often have little patience or permission to work with the neophytes. That’s because funders want results, or they get bored and disabused of the importance of the work.



Step Six: Be open-minded “Many organizations need volunteers, and most of them you've never heard of. Before you turn one down, learn about it. If you can, meet with staff to hear about what they do. You just might discover the ideal opportunity.”

Problem Six: It is very difficult to volunteer these days. Even before the financial collapse and the Obama Effect.
Due to the virtually non-existent interest among donors to fund infrastructure, marketing, internet presence or solid skills training for volunteer management, it is very difficult for the average person to find a place to volunteer - let alone figure out what’s going on before they show up. Non-profits are usually resourced to run ‘sexy’ programs, with most of the money targeted to deliverables (none of which seem to include the above items). The result is a veritable ghetto of skills among the rank and file non-profits in the US and Canada (I think it is a bit different in the UK and Australia).

So, upon reflecting on the less than stellar experience that she was able to offer at the United Way, Ms Ceccarelli said, “My hope is when they decide it’s time to do something else, they have fond memories of what they learned at United Way.” After a moment, she continued, “Maybe they’ll even become a donor. I’ll tell you, there isn’t an executive director in town who doesn’t think that way.” And there it is. Volunteers are fine, but money is always better. (read the full NY Times article)


Volunteers, better than money and easier to get


The 6 problems listed above are not always true everywhere you go. There are great non-profit organizations out there who know exactly what they are doing and are thereby leading the way out of the old “Charity” model - where volunteers are seen as a means to an end (until you raise enough money and can hire staff).

For my part, personal experience allows me to believe in and advocate the ideals. At Realized Worth, we utilize an approach that achieves the following;

FULLY AUTOMATED VOLUNTEER RECRUITING AND SCREENING. Remove time and personnel barriers by making everything from recruiting and screening to job assignment and evaluation automatic. (It’s not as difficult as it sounds - promise.)

CONNECT THE ORGANIZATIONS OBJECTIVES WITH THOSE OF THE VOLUNTEER. Acknowledge what the volunteer wants to do (which will be all the wrong things, of course) and start there. (What they want isn’t what you need, but start there anyway.)

TASKS AND ASSIGNMENTS PERFECTLY SUITED TO INDIVIDUAL VOLUNTEERS. You’ll only drive yourself nuts looking for the perfect volunteer, so build jobs around the people that show up. (If you look long and hard enough, you can find something close to the perfect volunteer, but it’s always too little, too late.)

ATTRACT THE BEST VOLUNTEERS, AND KEEP THEM. The most destructive part of most volunteer programs is treating everyone the same. Giving everyone equal say, equal privilege, equal leadership and equal recognition is a recipe for disaster. You will overwork the best and bore the hell out of the most promising.

LIMITED STAFF ARE REQUIRED. Re-write the job description of every staff member you have. In order to run an excellent volunteer program your staff must see themselves as facilitators of volunteers rather than “bosses” working to get a job done. Staff make it possible for volunteers to do the work, not the other way around.

A SUPERIOR VOLUNTEER MANAGEMENT PROCESS. I know you have a ‘primary audience’ with whom you work, whether it be diabetics or homeless youth. Your mission has got to include the broader population (stakeholders, if you want). You need them to buy in to your cause and push for long term, societal and political changes. Volunteers are as much the recipients of your good work as the ‘clients’ with whom you work.

I encourage you to read our six part series on achieving these goals for your own organization. And as always, I’m more than happy to answer questions. Contact me directly at chrisjarvis@realizedworth.com.
Share/Bookmark

By Susan Morgan: The Hottest Place in Hell

This is a re-post of an article by Susan Morgan, the Executive Director at Pax Communications. The post is from the Huffington Post, on March 12, 2009 | 05:43 PM (EST).

I received a 'Tweet' from Susan, pointing me to the blog, with an encouragement to text Secretary Clinton at 90822 concerning the issue. I encourage you to text Clinton, and express you concern to see this matter addressed immediately.

Susan Morgan: The Hottest Place in Hell

According to Martin Luther King, Jr., "The hottest place in Hell is reserved for those who remain neutral in times of great moral conflict." If Dr King were here with us today, I believe that he would unequivocally agree that the recent expulsion of aid groups in the Darfur region of Sudan has brought us to such a time of great moral conflict.

Last week, after the International Criminal Court issued a much deserved arrest warrant for Sudan's president Omer al-Bashir on charges of crimes against humanity and war crimes, Bashir brazenly responded by kicking 16 desperately needed humanitarian aid organizations out of the country.

In subsequent days, the silence from world leaders on this potential death sentence for the millions of Sudanese trapped in IDP camps has been deafening.

Over the weekend, as news organizations blared headlines such as "Dancing Bashir scoffs at Darfur warrant" and "Defiant Bashir vows to expel more aid groups," I searched the news waiting in vain for contrasting headlines announcing the condemnation of this action by world leaders such as Barack Obama, Gordon Brown and Nicholas Sarkozy, all of whom have repeatedly professed their concern for the people of Darfur.

The UN estimates that the expulsions will leave 1.1 million people without food, 1.5 million without health care and at least one million without drinking water. Additionally, a meningitis outbreak is threatening the lives of tens of thousands of refugees who now lack vaccinations and medical treatment. Time is clearly of the essence.

Understandably, the internally displaced persons (IDPs) trapped in camps have expressed shock and dismay at the unresponsiveness of the international community. Darfur activists have been similarly outraged by the world's silence.

Thankfully, on Tuesday, President Obama finally stepped forward to make a statement. "It is not acceptable to put that many people's lives at risk," he said. "We need to be able to get those humanitarian organizations back on the ground."

Read the full article here.

Posted using ShareThis
Share/Bookmark

Korea Shoots For The Moon Using Green Energy

For some, the present financial crises signals a defense against the many variables of an uncertain future. For others, it is the impetus to create the future of our imaginations. Nations with an emphasis on sustainability are about to emerge as the architects of the new global economy.


Collapse: Some nations will choose to fail, others to succeed

South Korea intends to opt out of the energy crises. Within the next few years, aggressive spending and re-prioritization will jolt the nation forward from a 5 percent energy self-sufficiency rate to 18 percent. By 2050, they intend to raise the rate to 50 percent.

In order to achieve this, the government intends to make, “all-out investments to boost the use of new and renewable energy.” The goal? “Korea (will become) a leading powerhouse in the green technology market, which is expected to amount to 3 quadrillion won by 2020”.

The President declared, “Every nook and cranny of the homeland... will be turned into a new world filled with flowers where solar, wind and tidal energy are fully utilized.” Beyond this, Korea has set it’s sights on emerging from this present crises as one of the top four nations producing green cars on the planet. I’m guess the other three won’t include the US at this rate.

People are beginning to reflect on what is actually happening during this global financial crises. Maybe it’s not just about sub-prime mortgages the financial clumsiness of swaggering bankers. Maybe it is actually a global paradigm shift. In his book Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed Jared Diamond suggests that the economy, the environment and society are always connected, each affecting the other for success or failure.

In a recent article for the NY Times, ‘The Inflection is Near?’, Thomas Friedman invites his readers to “step out of the normal boundaries of analysis of our economic crisis and ask a radical question: What if the crisis of 2008 represents something much more fundamental than a deep recession? What if it’s telling us that the whole growth model we created over the last 50 years is simply unsustainable economically and ecologically and that 2008 was when we hit the wall — when Mother Nature and the market both said: “No more.”

The choices before us are of a great magnitude and carry severe consequence - the enormity of which forestalls all timidity. Dr. Bradley Googin suggests that we are looking at a challenge akin to putting a man on the moon. “Is this not the best time to think boldly and creatively around the game changing that we have for a long time felt was necessary for a sustainable capitalism and for achieving a just and sustainable world?” he asks in his blog for the Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship.

It seems South Korea has decided this is exactly what’s happening. And they are unabashedly shooting for the moon.

The following is an excerpt from an address by president Lee Myung-bak on the 63rd anniversary of national liberation and the 60th anniversary of the founding of the Republic of Korea - August 15, 2008.


Vision for Another 60 Years: Low Carbon, Green Growth


My fellow citizens,


Currently, the Korean economy is undergoing difficulties stemming from the energy crisis. The socio-economic divide and job shortages are puttingan increasing burden on ordinary citizens. There is a growing sense of crisis that we might collapse. In order to weather through this crisis and jump over the threshold to advancement, more creative ideas and dauntless resolution are needed.


Now, we are witnessing changes in civilization. The world has gone through the stages of the agricultural, industrial and information revolutions. Now, it is entering the age of an environmental revolution. Leaving behind the era of wood, coal and oil, an age of new energy is now being opened.


For the Republic that does not produce even a single drop of oil, such changes are both a crisis and an opportunity as well. In retrospect, the Republic has exhibited great capacities in turning crises into opportunities. The Republic took the first oil shock as a springboard for its inroads into the overseas construction market and advancement of local industries. The second oil shock served as a catalyst for growth while pursuing stability and opening to the outside world. Now is the time for us to turn the recent surge in oil prices into an opportunity to transform economic fundamentals and create new growth engines.


Today, on the occasion of the 60th anniversary of the founding of the Republic of Korea, I want to put forward ‘Low Carbon, Green Growth’ as the core of the Republic’s new vision. Green growth refers to sustainable growth which helps reduce greenhouse gas emission and environmental pollution. It is also a new national development paradigm that creates new growth engines and jobs with green technology and clean energy. Green technology puts together information and communications technology, biotechnology, nanotechnology and culture technology, and transcends them all. Green technology will create numerous decent jobs to tackle the problem of growth without job creation. The renewable energy industry will create several times more jobs than existing industries. In the information age, the gap between the haves and have-nots has widened. On the contrary, the gap will narrow down in the age of green growth.


Green growth will enable a Miracle on the Korean Peninsula to succeed the Miracle on the Han River. When the Republic first manufactured its own vehicles, the technology gap with the advanced countries amounted to at least 50 years. As far as semiconductors are concerned, it was more than 20 years behind. However, the Republic grew into a technology powerhouse, which ranks first in terms of producing semiconductors and ships, and fifth in automobiles. If we make up our minds before others and take action, we will be able to lead green growth and take the initiative in a new civilization. To do this, I will make sure that the country comes up with new green growth engines for the next generation to use for 10 to 20 years.

Read the speech in it's entirety here.


Share/Bookmark

Can Your Technology Handle The Coming Surge In Volunteers?

During this economic downturn companies are finding themselves forced to reduce their financial contributions. Unwilling to walk away from issues they now view as their responsibility, they intend to meet falling charitable expectations with volunteering. Employee Volunteer Programs are projected to grow by 45 percent this year. There is a surge of volunteerism coming, and you need some good technology to handle it.

The Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship


The following is an excerpt from a Boston College's blog entry entitled Getting technical with volunteer programs.

As companies seek to better manage their corporate citizenship strategies and activities, they are taking a closer look at the operation of employee volunteering and giving programs. Like any other aspect of business, these programs turn to technology to improve efficiency and maximize effectiveness. But choosing a technology vendor with the appropriate applications and services to fit a program can be a shot in the dark.


The Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship now has information available to help shed some light on the technology options for employee volunteering and giving programs.

“Technology is no longer just a convenience for employee volunteering and giving programs. Technology is integral,” said Bea Boccalandro, a member of the
Boston College Center faculty and president of Vera Works, who coordinated work on the surveys with The Points of Light & Hands On Network and the Boston College Center. “It is often the first and most sophisticated contact employees have with the corporate citizenship program. It can define the parameters and possibilities of the program.” Read the full article here.

Bea Boccalandro is absolutely right. The technology used to facilitate employee volunteer and giving programs will determine how many employees participate, what kinds of projects are possible, and whether or not any of it can be measured to demonstrate success. Companies should never find their enthusiasm, ingenuity, or determination restricted by the very tools they use to build a successful program.

The coming 'surge' in volunteerism is about to test the limits of existing practices in volunteer management. Companies and non profits that get the technology right, will be ahead of the curve. These surveys offer just that kind of head start.

A little off the beaten path

There are, of course, some other options out there. Below is a list, which depending on where you are located, and what you are looking for, may fit the bill.

TimeBank.org (UK)

VolunteerSolutions.org (US)

YourCause.com (US)

VolunteerSpot.com (US)

TheVolunteerFamily.org (US)

DubaiCares.ae (UAE)

CivicFootprint.ca (CAN)

If you know of other helpful sites/technology platforms to manage volunteer programs, list them in the comments. Thanks all!
Share/Bookmark

Canada: Conflicted On Volunteering?

Having won the Oval Office, the Obama volunteer revolution is just picking up speed. Due to financial constraints, Corporate America intends to grow their volunteer efforts by a whopping 45%. From Washington DC to Mumbai; London to Dubai, volunteer activity is on the rise. Communities endorse it. Companies infuse it. Governments champion it....Except Canada. With no national policy or formalized system, Canuks are living in the stone age of civic duty. Why? Good question.

The 49th Parallel exposes contrasts


By now it is well known that President Obama is a fan of volunteering. During his campaign, he engaged volunteers with such effectiveness that he essentially stepped into the Oval Office out of nowhere. With 8 million volunteers mobilized for the campaign (not to mention his 4 million fans on Facebook alone), Obama rewrote the playbook on presidential campaigns. Now, you can follow President Obama on Twitter - and he’ll follow you back. Volunteerism continues to show up as a key ideology and pertinent strategy within Obama’s fast-paced presidency. (The Third Sector can also learn from Obama’s approach to volunteerism )

But that’s the United States of America.

Canada, it seems, is a bit more conflicted when it comes to the validity of volunteering.

The Federal Government recently announced that it would not support federal employees as volunteers at the 2010 Winter Olympics being held in British Columbia. This is in contrast to the Province of British Columbia’s policy which allows up to 200 government employees to volunteer utilizing paid vacation and paid leave in a 50/50 split. It seems British Columbia believes that both government and taxpayer come out way ahead in this arrangement. Advanced Education Minister Murray Coell explained, "It's really sort of an education for our staff, a free experience that they then bring back to the workplace.” Coell continued, "There is a benefit to taxpayers in the long run and to the public service, because employees have more skills."

Well that sounds just about right, doesn’t it? I mean this what everyone, including the Canadian government, talks about when it comes to the benefits of Corporate Volunteering programs. Recruitment, retainment, engagement and skill enhancement are just the beginning of the rewards that business can reap by supporting the volunteer work of their employees. Oh, and there are also the benefits of strengthening the community and the overall social fabric of the nation.

Surely the federal government of Canada not only supports volunteerism, but actually has mechanisms in place to facilitate the practice thereby leading the nation by example?

Um, no. Not really.

In fact, the federal government found no appreciable benefit to volunteering at the Olympics for government employees. In a memo on the issue, Treasury Board secretary Wayne Wouters states, "As the steward of taxpayers' money, we have to strike a balance between employee benefits, responsible management of public funds, and continuity of service to Canada.” The balance apparently translates to, “nope”, “no-way” and “never.”

I guess this makes sense if you don’t believe volunteering benefits the taxpayer. It makes sense if you see volunteering as merely an employee ‘perk.’ And I suppose it makes sense if you don’t believe in the transformative moments that can be found when you serve your neighbor.

And if this is you, I hope you don’t ever expect to walk out of where you are into places of great leadership.

New leaders offer new hope

Last week, Justin Trudeau delivered his first speech in the Canadian House of Commons. The son of one of Canada’s more famous Prime Ministers, Pierre Trudeau, Justin in fairly new to Parliament, having been elected in 2007. The speech, and the legislation that was tabled with it, concerned the formation of a national policy on volunteerism.

In his speech, Turdeau proclaimed, “The opportunity to invest in our communities and non-profit organizations, that do such a tremendous job already of helping out Canadians in times of need, is extraordinarily important. We need to make sure that our community organizations and the charitable entities, that work so hard to help out our seniors, youth, people in difficulty, working families or single mothers, receive stable sources of help.”

Speaking from a decidedly ‘youth’ perspective, Trudeau was imploring the House of Commons to begin investigating best practices from around the world that will facilitate and promote volunteerism in Canada. He believes such a framework will, “give young people a choice, many choices. They could see how they would like to serve and there would be a framework to approve the provinces, municipalities, NGOs and charitable community organizations, which would then find volunteers—young Canadians who perhaps live in that community or who perhaps come from the other side of the country—to provide all Canadians with the services that are so well delivered by community organizations.”

And herein lies the conflict: Young innovative leaders are poised alongside citizens, ready to change the world through mass mobilization, namely volunteering. Opposing them are the old, crusty guard, suspicious of the citizens who are wasting the nation’s time on frivolous and idealistic endeavors, namely volunteering.

I strongly recommend that the federal government follow the leadership of thought and practice demonstrated by the provinces. I also recommend that the senior membership of Parliament heed the tested and tried wisdom of its newest members.

Oh, I almost forgot.

When asked why the federal government felt they could not allow civil servants to volunteer, the response was something akin to, “Well, if we let people volunteer this time, then we’ll have to let everyone volunteer.” Good grief, that’s the answer of a parent who doesn’t have good rationale for a question from a child - a classic example of the continuum fallacy.

Sigh.
Share/Bookmark

Corporate Volunteering Becomes Popular: There’s Good News, And There’s Bad News

Corporate donations to charities in the US are about to plummet by over 50 percent. Corporate America intends to make up the difference by growing their volunteer programs by (a staggering) 45 percent. That might do the trick, except...few businesses know what to do or how to do it well. On top of that, managers don’t know how to measure success. The world of business is facing significant challenges - and under the merciless scrutiny of the public, there is little room for misstep.

When you were a kid, did you ever play that game with your friends where one began a story and the other responded by alternating the phrases, “Oh, that’s good” with, “No, that’s bad”? If I remember correctly, it would go something like,

So my friend found 50 dollars on the street yesterday.

Oh, that’s good.

No, that’s bad - it belonged to a robber.

Oh, that’s bad.

No, that’s good - cause when he came back for it, the police got him.

Oh, that’s good.

No, that’s bad - cause the police thought my friend was helping him.

And so on....

Ok well, the Conference Board in New York released a report today that has a bit of the game’s cadence to it. You can read the article here, but I’ve decided to re-tell it, for your entertainment.

So, looks like this year almost half of the businesses surveyed have reduced their donations to non-profits, with another 16 percent thinking they may have to do the same.

Oh, that’s bad

No, that’s fine - corporate donations in the US only account for 5.1 percent of charitable giving. A whopping 75 percent (229 billion in 2007) comes from individuals, anyway.

Oh, that’s good.

No, that’s bad - corporations are also cutting back employment. Plus, people have seen their savings wiped out by Wall Streets mismanagement so, people have a lot less to donate as well.

Oh, that’s bad.

No, that’s not too bad. It seems both corporations and individuals intend to meet falling charitable expectations with volunteering. Apparently, Corporate Volunteering is trending to grow by 45 percent this year. Companies are going to spend more on facilitating employee volunteering. It is intended to provide non profits with the kind of skills that they may not be able to afford in this downturn.

Oh, that’s good.

No, that’s great. The lack of dollars may force corporations to form meaningful partnerships with non profits to achieve socio-environmental solutions that will benefit the community, the business and it’s customers.

Um...wait, is that bad now? I think I’m confused...

No, that’s still good, but hard.

Oh, okay, um...

It’s hard because apparently the biggest concern with Corporate Volunteering is that most managers have no idea how to measure the results of their efforts in community impact. That, coupled with a lack of understanding of how to connect Corporate Volunteering with the company’s brand as well as raise awareness means that companies may never fully realize the value of the work their employees are doing.

Ok, wait, that is bad.

No, that is very bad. And I’ll tell you why - if you don’t understand the value of something, it won’t mean anything to you. So if companies aren’t given good guidance in this area - the area in which they’re hoping to use to make up for the drop in financial donations - they may not actually contribute very much to communities. Or worse, they will contribute great meaning, but they won’t know it and their customers won’t know it. In the end, it will just be treated like a ‘nicety’ that disappears when it gets easier to write cheques again.

Oh, that is bad.

Yes, that is bad.

Ok, so that’s the game (as I remember it). The point is, Corporate Volunteering can play an important role towards ensuring the health of our communities and the environment. Check out the article for yourself and tell me what you think. Is business savvy enough to figure out volunteerism? Or are dollars always better anyway?
Share/Bookmark

Walmart and Twitter Gang Up To Make The World Green

Walmart is greening its supply chain. Twitter is being used to expose corporate practices that are destroying communities and the environment. Instead of dampening an emphasis on sustainability practices, the Financial Crises seems to be heating it up.

ClimateChangeCorp.com posted this interesting article by Brendan May, the Managing Director of Planet 2050. He believes that even though the global economic crises appeared to threaten the trend towards greener business, that there are strong reasons why the opposite might be true. May argues “that the doomsayers and sceptics who argued that green business would be an early casualty of the credit crunch appear to have been proved wrong.”

May offers five reasons why Green Business will likely grow during the downturn.

There’s a new sheriff in Washington
"There will be many debates and trade-offs ahead. But the ‘chatter’ around the Obama phenomenon is, for now, sufficient for the business community to assume that the old rules will no longer apply, and that scrutiny of their environmental performance will increase rapidly in a way that was inconceivable under the previous regime."

‘Green’ means less greenbacks

"Combined with the economic stimulus plans being crafted, many of which place the search for new clean technologies at their heart, it is unlikely that people will look back on this global recession as a bad thing for the sustainability movement."

Walmart is a bully - but the good kind
"Steadily, Walmart has begun to implement its strategy. The most significant recent development is that all suppliers to Walmart are now being required to step up to the plate on sustainability – rightly so as Walmart cannot possibly reduce and eventually neutralise its environmental footprint without its suppliers doing the same."

Twitter has made talk cheap
"Environmental NGOs have an opportunity to exploit civil society’s inevitable dissatisfaction with businesses and governments at a time when both are being heavily blamed for a mixture of excesses and incompetence."

Everybody’s doing it
"Legislation, consumer interest, media coverage, NGO scrutiny and investor pressure are all headed in one direction – more not less green."

Read the full article here.

What do you think? Is this an overly optimistic view of things? Or have we reached some kind of tipping point on Sustainability?
Share/Bookmark

Web 2.0 Meets Corporate Social Responsibility

Development Crossing launches virtual roundtable of executives engaged in corporate social responsibility and international development.

This is a press release originally posted: New York, NY (PRWEB) February 25, 2009 -- Whether corporate social responsibility (CSR) has earned a seat at the table or not is no longer in question, the function has truly arrived and is gaining traction around the world. The question now becomes, will CSR initiatives survive the economic downturn and inevitable cost cutting?

To add some insight to this and other relevant topics, Development Crossing recently launched its virtual roundtable of executives engaged in corporate responsibility and international development. Through an ongoing series of executive interviews and other resources, the network aims to capitalize on the shared experience of its members to solve common challenges, share best practices and increase collaboration between all relevant stakeholders involved in sustainable development.

The community is designed as a shared resource center and networking platform for professionals engaged in corporate responsibility and international development, which enables users to create profiles, manage and contribute to discussions, create groups and events, and directly connect with other like-minded individuals. Several thousand members strong already, with backgrounds ranging from corporate social responsibility and microfinance to sustainable tourism and non-profit management, the network serves to enhance collaboration and facilitate idea exchange.

Development Crossing continues to accept new members who believe their expertise and experience may add value to the community. To learn more about Development Crossing, visit Development Crossing.


Share/Bookmark

Search This Blog

Loading...