How Good Is ‘Doing Good’?

Volunteerism is at an all-time high. From Obama and Oprah to unemployment and shrinking dollars for philanthropy, the United States is witnessing historic interest in volunteerism. This phenomena has been referred to as the ‘push and pull’ effect. The results are rather mixed, but generally speaking, I think this is a very good thing.

Companies have been promoting volunteerism in one way or another for a number of years. Recently however, we’ve begun to witness a shift evidenced by the convergence of interest between employees, corporations, communities, and governments. It used to be good to volunteer. Now, it is necessary.

This past April 25, more than 50,000 Comcast volunteers turned out for 500 projects in neighborhoods across the United States. Comcast is the largest cable company in the US, employing some 100,000 people. The mammoth event, which began it’s annual commencement in 2001, is known as “Comcast Cares Day.” While official statistics are virtually impossible to find, it’s safe to say that this event is one of the largest, single-day, corporate volunteering efforts in the country.

So...why do it? The logistics involved in organizing an event like this are staggering and the monetary costs are huge (think of the t-shirts alone). On top of these costs, Comcast donated an additional 1.5 million towards the 500 projects and organizations they worked on April 25 weekend.

If you ask Brian Roberts, the CEO of Comcast, he’ll tell you he believes this event is, “great for the company.” In an interview given to Fox News on April 23rd, Roberts stated, “It's great for the communities where we're their company and broadband provider. But, most of all, in these tough times, it just makes you feel connected to institutions, whether they are schools or rec centers or police athletic leagues, where people volunteer all the time. And, so, for Comcast, this is — it makes it so special.”

But are special feelings enough?

I put the question to Charisse Lillie, Vice President of Community Investment and Executive Vice President of the Comcast Foundation. Except...instead of asking about “special feelings” (that seemed weird) I decided to go straight to the roots and ask, “What are the measurable outcomes?” A lot of good work is being done - and for a relatively high cost. I figured it’s fair to assume that the results of such an effort are being measured.

But, no. While Lillie seems to wholeheartedly agree that metrics are vital for long-term success, she admits that Comcast is not at a stage where they are collecting that information. One reason for this is a simple lack of good tools. The technology used to organize “Comcast Cares Day” could not have allowed them to effectively collect the data - even if they wanted to. Essentially, Comcast boasts the biggest corporate volunteering effort out there....and yet, there are no measurable outcomes and no means to collect data. Now, that doesn’t mean they haven’t thought through priorities and effective strategy. For example, Comcast has identified youth leadership development, volunteerism and literacy as priorities for their community investment. But good priorities do not ensure effective outcomes.

So...is this lack of data a bad thing?

As my readers know, I am a strong proponent of good data collection. What’s more, I firmly believe that unless employer-sponsored volunteerism is tied to the functional strategies of business (such as HR or Marketing), it can easily be relegated to peripheral niceties. In order for corporate volunteering programs (and Corporate Social Responsibility as a whole) to fully realize the associated costs, they must begin to function as a business strategy - not as philanthropy.

Yet, most companies I interact with find this kind of integration extremely difficult. Elaine Cohen, a CSR reporting consultant with Beyond Business, argues this difficulty is not due to lack of data, but the fact that the essential information is often mixed in with data being collected for other reasons. The field is so new that standard methods of collection, aggregation, and reporting are not yet established. In fact, Cohen believes that the very practice of reporting will force better methods while underscoring the importance of developing these disciplines.


Fortunately, these new methods are already becoming available. A company I work with, True Impact, offers an online tool which effectively tackles the problem of ROI metric collection. True Impact’s CEO, Farron Levy, believes his online tool will not only help companies with the problem of metrics, but will also aid in the movement from a “charity” mindset to one that acknowledges the business benefits of CSR.

Despite the widespread lack of reporting methodology, technology, and standards, companies like Comcast have decided to follow their instincts and, “do good.” And this is not a bad thing. This is, in fact, an extraordinarily good thing.

Why? Well, while Lillie may not be to summarize the success of the day with a report-worthy mathematical ratio, she knows that all across the United States, Comcast Cares Day changed lives for the better. She knows this because she picked up trash along the Chickamauga Creek in Tennessee at the Creek River Rescue project and as she did, she could just envision the little 5th grader who would walk along this river after having spent his entire childhood in the confines of the inner city. For a kid familiar only with asphalt and storm drains, an experience on the banks of a river is formative, and Lillie knew the “river rescue” could be add beauty to that child’s life.

These hopes of a better future are often difficult for upper-middle class people to grasp, especially those whose lives are a plethora of river banks and cities alike. I agree with Lillie’s perspective, but only because I, too remember the experience that helped me understand. I was in a car with an 11-year old, driving to a picnic event in the country. Unbelievably, this child had not traveled 10 blocks away from his apartment complex, must less out of the city. As we drove, I had a increasingly difficult time watching the road as this kid’s world grew and his life changed. You should have seen his face when he saw his very first cow! He kept repeating, “Look at the moo’s!” Now, you can blame all this on the education system if you like, but the fact was, this boy had never seen animals other than cats, dogs and rats before that day. I guarantee you he never forgot it! And while “Blue Planet” is an amazing production, you can’t quite beat connecting with nature directly. Information is helpful, but experience changes us.

We each have a responsibility to share these experiences with others in our context. In the workplace, and particularly within an employee volunteer program, “story” is one of the most effective methods for changing the culture of business. Comcast Cares Day put a strong emphasis on story and has already seen significant benefits resulting from this effort. Unfortunately, many companies fail to capture an event’s momentum, enthusiasm, sense of purpose, and energy. When the event is over, the experience is over. Instead, companies need to collect and share stories. Only when employees have a chance to talk about their experiences and reflect on what happened, will the enormous benefit of the event be realized. The optimal way to achieve this is to create intentional space once the event is over that is used solely for the purpose of story-telling and reflection. (And I say provide good eats! Food makes every story better!)

This “intentional space” however, should not (never, ever) look like a stuffy awards ceremony, or a memo that says, “staff reflection in 15 minutes.” We’re in a new era that has provided fun and innovative methods for communication. Comcast, for example, used two familiar forms for connecting: Twitter and Facebook. They set up a twitter account @comcastcares, and then encouraged the employees to send tweets throughout the event. A Facebook page allowed employees in St Paul to post comments and pictures all day long. At caresday.net, Comcast combined video with a twitter stream. Friends and family were also able to access these feeds and sites. Think about it! 50,000 people, each with unique online networks. That’s an audience of at least a few million. Add to that the rest of us, plus secondary networks, and you can see why Comcast Cares Day found it’s way to the top 10 issues discussed on Saturday. That’s pretty amazing considering the attention being given to the Swine Flu and other pressing economic and political issues.

Why not check in directly with some people who were tweeting the event?
Ask @shaunacausey about Social Media training for 15 nonprofits in Seattle
@foleymo would probably tell you about showing The Seattle Arts council in benefits of Social Media

I asked Charisse Lillie if Comcast had any concerns about putting themselves out there like that. Wasn’t Comcast afraid of a Domino’s debacle? What about screwing up and looking like Amazon, “the internet company that doesn’t understand the internet”? Lillie’s answer was insightful. She said, “you know, we trust our people. If we can’t trust them for something like this, then we’ve been hiring the wrong people.” Could something bad have happened? Yep. But it’s not about that. It’s about what kind of company you are. And frankly, I trust companies who trust their staff.

Overall, I can’t help but feel pretty impressed by Comcast Cares Day - despite the lack of metrics. Comcast captured stories in a way that allows the stories themselves to become part of the Comcast culture. This consequently influences the culture and allows for new perspectives and understandings to be institutionalized into the company. In addition, Comcast managed to free up the social networking power of their employees and tap into the latent social capital that companies their size would do well to utilize, particularly while we have less economic capital available.

Wait a minute.....did we just find the metrics we weren’t looking for?

Congratulations on a great day Comcast. We’ll see you in the neighborhood next year. Bring an extra T-shirt, maybe some of us will even help out.

Email; chrisjarvis@realizedworth.com
LinkedIn Profile; http://www.linkedin.com/in/chrisjarviscan
Twitter; @RealizedWorth
Share/Bookmark

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

What's your point - if metrics cannot be applied to altruism then it will never become a core business initiative?
Frankly, most dashboards including marketing, web analytics, crm, ERP, et al - are bogus. Garbage in, garbage out. They rely on algorithms that make the assumptions rather than inductive / empirical data. If executive leadership can't make decisions without the subjective data crutch then they should step aside. Though Comcast is a reprehensible monopoly that needs good press, the "good" work that their employees do shouldn't be marginalized. Do your metrics cover karma: "we rip off millions every day, but give one day back...?" The analogies with Dominos and Amazon are tenuous at best. Yes, Amazon goofed, but their technology actually works on a massive scale. There is not another etailer that has such a robust, helpful, and non-intrusive platform (I hold no shares and mourn the closure of many local book and music shops, but hate the game not the layer).
I like data, it is nice, I can blame it for bad decisions. But if I can't make a good decision based on common sense, then all fluffy "trueimpacts" of the world won't help.
Cynical about Comcast - proud the employees.

Anonymous said...

I believe Deloitte's Impact Day rivals Comcast's, and they have done some interesting research on corporate volunteering...

Lori Goldstein said...

On the subject of measuring impact, see a list of research papers by various academic and other entities, at http://www.taprootfoundation.org/about/news_guide.php.
Also see the Taproot Foundation's 2008 paper, http://www.taprootfoundation.org/docs/SM_WhitePaper_Oct2008.pdf.

Anonymous said...

This story is incredibly refreshing.
In the business world, everything is broken down into measurable economic impact -- and understandably so. Metrics are crucial for evaluation, growth and development. Taking a step back, however, and looking at the whole picture, not just each individual puzzle piece, is even more important for sustained long-term success. I am excited by this recognized use of qualitative data. There is great value in stories and experiences -- great value in human interaction. CSR is an excellent outlet for utilization of qualitative data. Where could it be more appropriate for a large corporation to think about human impact -- and why they really do care? I look forward to future validation of qualitative reporting. Perhaps stepping away from the numbers for a moment will lead to even more "good" works.

On a final note, this Comcast customer has new respect for the company that identifies trust for its staff as a vital characteristic.

Search This Blog

Loading...

Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability and Cause Marketing News